Iron Man (1951)

Iron Man (1951) is a violent rivalry blue collar remake boxing film noir sport action movie, making it to the film noir canon for its portrayal of a man's inability to control his fists.

Of all the miserable movie mugs, hats off to Jeff Chandler who pulls the stiffest and hangedest doggest looks, spitting noir at times and flat out desperate to have his cheeks raised in a smile that will never come.

Better still is the coal mining back ground form which these tough mugs emerged, solid mining milieu not so much Zola as Zoloft as a man goes mad with coal dusts and mania.

Not just coaly but a gritty, hard-hitting noir that'll knock you flat on your back albeit in a beautifully photographed ring, and for fans of boxing noir and boxing movies, this must simply be an underrated and overlooked gem, or lump of coal, whichever way you want to look at it. 

Jeff Chandler takes center stage as Coke Mason, a coal miner with dreams as simple as they come: marry his girl Rose and run his own business. But when his brother George, a slick gambler played by Stephen McNally, sees a cash cow in Coke's rage, he pushes him into the brutal world of professional boxing.

This article by the way, discusses the end of this picture, in its last paragraph. That is by way of a spoiler alert, and although endings of film noir movies of the era are rarely a surprise, this one has one small aspect of interest to it that will make it worth our mentioning.

Coke's got a killer instinct that might just be too much for the ring to handle. As he climbs the ranks, he's haunted by the demons of his own making, struggling to keep his humanity in a world where violence reigns supreme.

Directed by Joseph Pevney, the mastermind behind some of the darkest noirs of the era, "Iron Man" is a blistering tale of ambition, betrayal, and redemption. And with a supporting cast that includes the likes of Rock Hudson, James Arness, and Jim Backus, you know you're in for one hell of a ride.

The joys of Coke and Speed are never better expressed than in Iron Man (1951). Nobody can get enough of Coke and Speed and that is one of the terrific joys of this production, the amount of Coke and Speed you will enjoy.

Once you hit the Coke and Speed in fact, you'll enjoy it more and more, and when Rock Hudson does Speed, he doesa it so very well, and it's so much more fun too when Jeff Chandler is doing Coke.

He does Coke to perfection in fact. Mad and bad, of course, just rampaging wild when he goes over into his Bruce Banner mode, and you would not be surprised to see this in a kind of 1951 incarnation, a man going Bruce Banner bad, over the edge and into the mode, a fit or a feege. Iron Man Jeff Chandler is a fine film noir feege in fact, that toppling lunacy, which is out of control.

And he is a bad boxer, a bad, bad boxer, even though Jeff Chandler is a great boxer and trained hard for this. Rock Hudson you can tell did not, and cannot box.

But these guys represent more and more Coke and Speed throughout this film, and the Coke and Speed only gets better as the film goes on.

So lace up your gloves LOL AI did definitely not write this, and step into the ring with Coke Mason. Because in Iron Man, he's all man, all CRAZY MAN, in a joyful 82 minutes of tragic crazy man noir, whether he's throwing punches or fighting for his soul.

# In the timeless tapestry of cinematic narratives, "Iron Man" emerges as a tale of ambition and inner conflict, woven against the gritty backdrop of coal mines and boxing rings. Here, we encounter a coal miner harboring dreams of entrepreneurial endeavor, only to find himself ensnared in the brutal world of pugilism—a realm where he transforms into a pariah, despised by the very public he once aspired to serve.

Why is boxing such an integral and important subject in the noir canon? 

Indeed, the genre of boxing films remains steadfastly loyal to its age-old traditions, steadfast in its adherence to familiar tropes and themes. 

Across the years, across the years, what can we say, of . . . of . . . cinematic history, the dramatic elements and narrative peculiarities have undergone such evolution that the boxing tragedy movie could explore masculinity long before masculinity was even a thing. 

Even a thing, yes! But this was the Golden Age and these are golden movies, every last one of them, clinging resolutely to the well-trodden path of timeless tales. Consider, if you will, the enduring legacy of the Rocky franchise — actually don't, they are not film noirs those Rocky films, whereas film noirs are a testament to the enduring relevance of age-old stories of triumph against the odds.

In the annals of the cinematic world, upon the release of the motion picture, the esteemed scribes of The New York Times proffered forth a critique, casting their discerning eyes upon the celluloid tale that unfolded upon the silver screen. With measured pens and tempered judgments, they opined that the narrative, depicting a pugilist ensnared by the specter of his own innate ferocity, trod a familiar path, lacking in the brilliance that might elevate it to the pantheon of cinematic excellence.

Verily, the esteemed cast, director, and scenarist approached their duties with a commendable professionalism, their dedication evident in the earnest execution of their respective roles. Yet, despite their earnest endeavors, the verdict of the critics did not deem them worthy of ascending to the echelons inhabited by their illustrious predecessors. The specter of esteemed forebears, such as the legendary "Champion," cast a long shadow upon the endeavors of "Iron Man," leaving it languishing in the penumbral realm of mediocrity.

Yet, let it not be said that the shortcomings of the film lay solely at the feet of its performers. Nay, for the detractors found fault not in the portrayals themselves, but in the very fabric of the narrative tapestry. While the pugilistic encounters depicted therein possessed a certain visceral excitement, the critics lamented the lack of authenticity in the fisticuffs, bemoaning the telegraphed nature of the blows exchanged upon the screen.

Thus, in the grand theater of critique, the verdict was rendered: "Iron Man," though a valiant effort by all involved, faltered in its pursuit of cinematic greatness, consigned to the ranks of forgettable celluloid fare. Yet, in the ebb and flow of critical discourse, one cannot help but wonder if there lies within the film's flaws a kernel of potential, awaiting the discerning eye of a future generation to unearth its hidden virtues and redeem it from the mire of obscurity.

Invariably, the narrative arc of such films mirrors the journey of our protagonist—a humble soul thrust into the crucible of combat, seeking solace and self-actualization amidst the chaos of the ring. Yet, as success beckons and old alliances fracture, the hero is faced with a moment of reckoning—an existential crossroads where the allure of victory clashes with the moral quandaries of conscience.

Directed by the seasoned hand of Joseph Pevney, "Iron Man" stands as a testament to his oeuvre, albeit not his magnum opus. While Pevney's filmography boasts its share of intriguing titles, this particular entry may not rank among his finest achievements. Nevertheless, within its frames lies a narrative tapestry rich with themes of ambition, sacrifice, and the eternal struggle for identity in the face of adversity.

Ah, the enigma of cinematic oblivion befalls upon the forgotten gem of 1951, "Iron Man," not solely for its lack of remembrance, but also for the faint whisper of a storyline, scarcely captivating in its essence. Herein lies the tale of a youth, gripped by the gnawing fear of his own latent brutality, poised upon the precipice of pugilistic glory. Yet, as the tendrils of fate entwine with the desires of his beloved, a tempest of conflict brews within his soul—a tempest wrought from the clash between the fervor of the ring and the tender entreaties of his heart's desire.

The power of laughter to evoke anger and violence in certain individuals is a multifaceted phenomenon rooted in psychological, social, and cultural dynamics. Laughter, often perceived as a harmless expression of amusement, can wield a potent influence, particularly when wielded in a context that challenges an individual's sense of self-worth, beliefs, or authority.

At its core, laughter can serve as a form of social communication, conveying subtle messages of mockery, derision, or contempt. When directed towards a person or group, particularly in a demeaning or belittling manner, laughter can trigger feelings of humiliation, shame, or inadequacy. For individuals with fragile egos or heightened sensitivity to perceived threats, such laughter can provoke a defensive response, leading to feelings of anger or resentment.

Moreover, laughter possesses the capacity to disrupt social hierarchies and power dynamics. In situations where laughter is used as a tool to undermine authority or challenge established norms, individuals in positions of power may perceive it as a direct affront to their status or control. This perceived challenge to authority can evoke a visceral reaction, prompting individuals to respond aggressively in an effort to reassert dominance and restore order.

Cultural factors also play a significant role in shaping the relationship between laughter and aggression. In societies where notions of honor, respect, and dignity hold sway, laughter directed towards individuals or groups can be interpreted as a grave insult, warranting a swift and forceful retaliation to preserve one's reputation and honor.

Furthermore, individual differences in personality, temperament, and past experiences can influence how individuals interpret and respond to laughter-induced provocation. For some individuals, past traumas or insecurities may render them particularly sensitive to perceived slights, leading them to react with disproportionate aggression when confronted with laughter.

The tragic crazy man act of Coke turns sweet at the denouement because all he wanted all along was love and acceptance of course, but it is a beautiful moment in fact when the crowd applaud genuine action and good sportsmanship and craft too form the miner turned boxing psychopath. He came good and that does not usually happen in noir.

IRON MAN (1951) on Wikipedia

Directed by Joseph Pevney

Genres - Drama  |   Sub-Genres - Sports Drama  |   Release Date - Sep 20, 1951 (USA - Unknown), Sep 20, 1951 (USA), Aug 18, 1953 (USA - Limited)  |   Run Time - 82 min.  

No comments:

Post a Comment